Monday 19 November 2012

The Nasat introduces...Pahkwa-thanh

The first two threads apparently prompted some members of the Trek BBS to read the stories involving the featured species, so I guess this is working pretty well as a feature, for all that it’s a mostly unorganized one. For the third entry, I thought I’d take another step back from big players like the Tzenkethi and take a look at the Pahkwa-thanh, who are a relatively minor species, but have a major character representing them and so in that regard are at least as notable as Nasats.

The Pahkwa-thanh are the race to which Dr. Shenti Yisec Eres Ree of Star Trek: Titan belongs; so far, he’s the only Pahkwa-thanh character we have. He – and they – were introduced in Taking Wing, the first Titan novel, and were immediately interesting by virtue of being non-humanoid (as mentioned in the Nasat thread, a rarity among Federation aliens). We have art; a head-shot, anyway. Behold the smiling face of Pahkwa-thanhity:



Of course, one of the defining characteristics of the Star Trek: Titan series is its heavily non-human, impressively non-humanoid crew. Given that Dr. Ree is one of the major characters, and especially given that his introduction in Taking Wing serves to demonstrate how Titan differs from the comfortable and familiar world of TNG (Riker learning just how hard it might be to adjust, best intentions aside), it’s clear that the Pahkwa-thanh are one of the “showcase” aliens for the series. Basically: “This is a very diverse crew, and here’s a good example, the chief medical officer is a therapod dinosaur!”. Indeed, a lot of readers have taken the dinosaur resemblance, made explicit in Taking Wing, and made it the defining trait of the character: Dr. Ree, he’s the dinosaur. I’ve done it myself in my “humorous novel recap” thread (in that case the implicit joke being that he’s actually a dinosaur). Dr Ree is the friendly dinosaur from our imaginations.



It's not my fault they didn't give us art for the rest of the body! (Yes, I know he's oriented horizontally, not vertically)

Is this "dinosaur" label really fair to the Pahkwa-thanh, though? While they’re not a very notable species in the Trek lit universe as a whole (their appearance outside of Titan stories limited to one walk-on cameo and a name-drop), we have learnt enough about them to justify relating to them as an actual alien people, not a walking advert for IDIC or a Startrekosaurus vocalis. For one thing, while they’re still essentially one of the aliens created by taking Earth creatures and giving them sapience, at least in this case they borrow from several sources. Physically, a Pahkwa-thanh is essentially a cross between a komodo dragon and a dromaeosaur. And while the venomous bite introduced in Destiny takes them deeper into the reptile camp, other habits are borrowed from the dromaosaurs’ avian relatives. We’re given insight into their breeding in Over A Torrent Sea (with a few hints established prior to this in Destiny, regarding nesting behaviour and feeding the young), and it’s clear that Pahkwa-thanh breed like ratites. (Ratites being large flightless birds without a keel on their sternum, meaning they couldn’t fly even if they had suitable wings). Like many such birds, Pahkwa-thanh apparently construct nests where the male watches over the eggs and young, implicitly attracting as many mates as he can (and so perhaps raising several females' young together?)

Moving on to what truly makes them a memorable addition to Trek lit, a defining trait of the Pahkwa-thanh is their aversion of the “Carnivore Confusion” trope. This refers to the general awkwardness which results when members of a multi-species cast have a natural diet that should logically include other members. Rather than hand-wringing a vague answer or ignoring the issue, instead it was decided to embrace the implications and give readers some interesting comparative alien psychology. While the Pahkwa-thanhs’ carnivorous diet (and some people’s poor reaction to it) is established in the opening novels, their predatory nature is first explored in the third book, Orion’s Hounds, where through Ree’s relative comfort with the hunting practices of the novel’s guest aliens we start to see the universe through Pahkwa-thanh eyes. They themselves still engage in hunts, having a metabolism geared toward bursts of activity prior to feeding, and consequently they maintain a sense of integration with the natural order. As such, their prey animals are defined by their spiritual presence, considered to have souls and respected as equal participants in the struggle. Prey is not just food; it’s a powerful entity that must be honoured and grappled with on both the physical and the metaphysical plane. As a result of this cultural mindset, Pahkwa-thanh have, in theory, no qualms about killing and consuming other sapient beings. In practice, they wouldn’t prey on their alien colleagues because (and besides the Federation presumably having a “citizens may not consume other citizens” law hidden away somewhere) it would be intolerably rude. And when you’re a large predatory being with the capability to do serious damage in a very short time, you need to have social mechanisms in place to prevent conflict, meaning Pahkwa-thanh are nearly never rude.

In Orion’s Hounds, this aspect of the Pahkwa-thanh race is played alongside not only the Pa’haquel people (who seamlessly combine mystical and practical perspectives on the hunt) but also the Fethetrit, another predator species who in contrast to Pahkwa-thanh are very rude indeed. In later stories, further mileage is gotten out of the uneasy contrast between Ree as a gentle and good-natured character and Ree as a predator. The biting incident in Destiny (with the Caeliar expressing shock at his methods), the intimidating paternal protective mode he enters in Over A Torrent Sea, even the reversal in Seize the Fire when Ree’s presence proves comforting to the Gorn character (who is himself a carnivorous reptile). So, Trek lit has actually explored the mindset and cultural worldview of Pahkwa-thanh, demonstrating how a predatory species might integrate with the other peoples of the Federation. Which means Ree is indeed more than just "the dinosaur", joking aside.

I'd personally enjoy seeing more Pahkwa-thanh, and maybe someday seeing their society or homeworld?
In the short story "Empathy", we're shown a glimpse of the Mirror Universe Pahkwa-thanh, and one of the interesting points about them was their healthy relationship with the Klingons. (For those who haven't read "Empathy", the Pahkwa-thanh managed to repel an invasion attempt by the Empire, and in fighting so effectively apparently impressed the Klingons without offending them (always a difficult balancing act with Klingons, it's difficult to "win" where they're concerned). This led to the Klingons holding Pahkwa-thanh in high regard, so apparently they're doing a lot better than most cultures who wind up in the path of the Alliance). It was only a small piece of background history, but given that the author has descibed Ree as essentially the same character in both universes, it suggests great adaptability on the part of the Pahkwa-thanh while also giving us a sense of how effectively they're grounded in their own identity. They can prosper as an effective part of the Federation in one reality and as an associate of the Klingon Empire at its battle-thirsty height in another, without being truly subsumed by either. That in itself gives a sense of the vigor of these aliens, and emphasises their distinctiveness, rather than having them be one of "the mongrel races" of the Federation (to quote a certain Romulan). They're not just hangers-on to humans, they're uniquely distinct.

One final comment to conclude this introduction: I like how the name "Pahkwa-thanh" is distinct from the normal naming conventions for Trek (and other) aliens. However, since we've discovered that their homeworld is Pahkwa, it seems likely that, actually, they're indeed "Pahkwa-ians". Which is amusing, I suppose.

No comments:

Post a Comment